Meslek s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin aksine, hafta sonu ve mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015far\u0131da ilave meslek yapan eleman kap\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcne konuldu. Mahkemeden eli anlams\u0131z d\u00f6nen i\u015f\u00e7iye Yarg\u0131tay’dan da fena haber geldi.<\/p>\n
Mahsul dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 meslek yerinden hafta sonlar\u0131 ve izin g\u00fcnlerinde foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle kovuldu\u011funu bildiren bir ki\u015fi, Meslek Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvurdu. I\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ilave i\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla haks\u0131z ve ge\u00e7ersiz olarak feshedildi\u011fini bildiren \u015fikayet\u00e7i, i\u015fe iadesine, i\u015fe ba\u015flat\u0131lmamas\u0131 halinde \u00f6denmesi gereken tazminat ile bo\u015fta ge\u00e7en zaman \u00fccret ve \u00f6teki haklar\u0131n\u0131n tespitine karar verilmesini talep etti. Mahkemede savunma yapan san\u0131k i\u015fveren ise davac\u0131n\u0131n profesyonel olarak foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k i\u015fi ile de ilgilendi\u011fini, i\u015fini yaparken \u015firketin imkanlar\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kendi i\u015finin reklamlar\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun sadakat borcuna anormallik te\u015fkil etti\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Davac\u0131n\u0131n meslek s\u00f6zle\u015fmesindeki konuya ili\u015fkin \u00f6zel d\u00fczenlemeyi ihlal etti\u011fini ifade ederek feshin hakl\u0131 sebebe dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddini istek etti. <\/p>\n
DURU\u015eMA I\u015e VEREN\u0130 HAKLI BULDU<\/strong><\/p>\n Duru\u015fma, taraflar aralar\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen hizmet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 10. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak davac\u0131n\u0131n kar maksatl\u0131 olarak di\u011fer bir i\u015f ile i\u015ftigal etti\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye tutars\u0131z olan bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdinin feshi i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli sebep oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verdi. \u015eikayet\u00e7i, istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulununca devreye B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi girdi.<\/p>\n “EMEK\u00c7I DI\u011eER B\u0130R \u0130\u015eTE \u00c7ALI\u015eMAMAYI TAAHH\u00dcT EDER”<\/strong><\/p>\n Davac\u0131n\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7eken duru\u015fma; s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin feshine sebep olarak g\u00f6sterilen durumun 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 kanunun 25\/II. f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015f sebeplerden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. Davac\u0131n\u0131n mesai saatleri d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya ve hafta sonlar\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k i\u015fini ba\u015fl\u0131ca i\u015fine yans\u0131tt\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve bu sebeple san\u0131k taraf\u0131n zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair kan\u0131t bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u015five yapt\u0131. Duru\u015fma, \u015fikayet\u00e7i vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verdi. Karar\u0131, bu kez daval\u0131 avukat\u0131 temyiz etti. Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 22. Hukuk Dairesi, emsal bir karara imza att\u0131. Kararda mahsul dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan davac\u0131n\u0131n, “\u00c7al\u0131\u015fan, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi devam etti\u011fi s\u00fcrece, \u00f6zel de olsa ba\u015fka bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmamay\u0131 taahh\u00fct eder. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan, \u015firkette \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde, ba\u015fka bir i\u015fverene ait meslek uygun ya da kendi nam ve hesab\u0131na \u00fccretli veya \u00fccretsiz olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015famaz” h\u00fckm\u00fc yer alan meslek s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine imza koydu\u011fu hat\u0131rlat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n “I\u015e S\u00d6ZLE\u015eMES\u0130NE AYKIRI DAVRANILMI\u015eTIR”<\/strong><\/p>\n Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131nda \u015fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere yer verildi: <\/p>\n “Davac\u0131n\u0131n hobi olarak ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 foto\u011fraf\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k i\u015fini zamanla ilgili meslek s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil edecek \u015fekilde ticari kazan\u00e7 getirecek bi\u00e7imde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f yeri yetkililerine g\u00f6nderilen e-mail \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131s\u0131 ile sabittir. Hem meslek nedeniyle ziyarete gitti\u011fi daval\u0131 \u015firketin m\u00fc\u015fterisinin masas\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n bro\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn tan\u0131t\u0131m maksatl\u0131 olarak yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 da yeniden dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki telefon (whatsapp) \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131lar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Hal b\u00f6yle olmakla birlikte, san\u0131k \u015firketin etkinlik konusu ile davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ftigal etti\u011fi i\u015fin konular\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortadad\u0131r. San\u0131k kadar davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6teki meslek nedeniyle performans\u0131n\u0131n etkilendi\u011fi ya da daval\u0131n\u0131n zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddias\u0131nda bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. \u0130lgili davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n hakl\u0131 sebep te\u015fkil edecek nitelikte ve a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta bulunmamakla birlikte, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine kurals\u0131zl\u0131k nedeniyle fesih i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erli bir sebep oldu\u011fu ve bu sebeple feshin ge\u00e7erli nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilerek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, hatal\u0131 de\u011fer bi\u00e7me ile yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bahane y\u00f6n\u00fcnden karar verilmesi yanl\u0131\u015f olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. Alan Adliye Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozularak ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve \u015fikayet\u00e7i taleplerinin reddine oy birli\u011fi ile karar verilmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Meslek s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin aksine, hafta sonu ve mesai...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":717,"featured_media":49294,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[380,381,1955,10260,12116],"class_list":["post-49295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ekonomi","tag-haber","tag-haberler","tag-isci","tag-son-dakika","tag-yargitay"],"aioseo_notices":[],"views":340,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/717"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49295"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49295\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/haberrizem.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}